The $175M Chicago boarding school story about Cardi B is 100% fake. Explore how this rumor spread, why it’s false, and learn to spot Cardi B fake news, fan fiction, and misinformation before sharing.
Did Cardi B Really Sign a $175 Million Contract for a Chicago Boarding School? We Investigate
Let’s cut the crap—this story is 100% fake news. Claims that Cardi B signed a $175 million contract to build a boarding school for orphans in Chicago are completely false. No credible evidence exists. None. Zilch. This isn’t some inside scoop—this is fan fiction gone viral.
Social media posts on platforms like Instagram and Facebook sparked the rumor, shared by accounts like @rapseaviral, @hoestmeme, and websites like Mega Latinos, a society & culture page with 60K followers on Facebook. These stories spread like wildfire, with people clicking, sharing, and hyping a narrative that doesn’t exist. Some fans might think they’re glorifying Cardi B—but posting unverified claims is manipulating facts and creating misinformation, plain and simple.
The Origin of the Fake Story
The story originated on social media, likely as a prank or viral deepfake. It plays on two things: our fascination with celebrities and the desire to see them doing “good deeds.” But the truth? There’s nothing official—no contract, no boarding school project, no press release from Cardi B’s team, nothing.
Lack of Credible Evidence
Here’s the reality check: no legitimate news outlet has reported this. No journalism site, no verified press, nothing that passes basic fact-checking. The claim is pure fan fiction, masquerading as news.
- Cardi B’s net worth is allegedly between $80–100 million. How exactly would she sign a $175 million contract—nearly double her net worth? That math doesn’t check.
- Why Chicago? Cardi B hails from New York. If she were building a real school, it would make sense to do it in her home state.
How the Rumor Spread
Fake news thrives on shares, likes, and engagement, and this story did exactly that. Social media users reposted the fabricated claim without checking facts. Fans may have thought they were “helping” Cardi B’s image, but glorifying clickbait and lies is never okay. Common sense should have kicked in—yet the story gained traction.
Why This Matters
This isn’t just gossip—it’s a lesson in media literacy. The lines between fan fiction, false reporting, and legitimate news blur when we fail to fact-check. Cardi B has been targeted by fake news and false reports before—remember the Tasha K lawsuits and all the drama around her social media claims? This is the same cycle repeating.
How to Spot Fake News About Celebrities
- Check for credible sources—if major outlets aren’t reporting it, it’s probably fake.
- Look at the accounts spreading the story. Are they verified or known for sensationalism?
- Consider the logic—does it make sense financially, geographically, or contextually?
The Bottom Line: There is no Cardi B Contract to Help Kids in Chicago
Cardi B did NOT sign a $175 million contract for a Chicago boarding school. Stop letting unverified sites, rage-baiters, and overzealous fans manipulate reality. Be smarter. Protect your feeds. And for the love of truth—don’t share clickbait as fact.
Suggested Articles to Explore Next
If you want to dive into deeper content about cardi b read the articles below by clicking on the highlighted topic.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Spotting Fake News in 2025
How to spot Fake News 2025 Deeper Look
The following answers are designed to help you navigate the complex information landscape of 2025, focusing on both traditional media literacy and new AI-driven threats.
Core Strategies and Mindset.
Q1: Why is adopting a "Stop, Think, and Verify" mindset essential when consuming news in 2025?
Sophisticated fake news and deepfakes are specifically engineered to bypass quick skepticism by triggering powerful emotions like anger or panic. This emotional reaction encourages immediate, uncritical sharing. By pausing before you act, you create a necessary buffer to evaluate the information rationally, preventing you from becoming an unwitting participant in a disinformation campaign. This critical mindset is the first and most powerful defense against advanced manipulative content.
Q2: What is the single most reliable action I can take before trusting a shocking piece of news?
The most reliable action is to cross-check the facts across at least two major, established news sources and dedicated, non-partisan fact-checking organizations (like Snopes or PolitiFact). If a major, world-changing story is only being reported by a single, unfamiliar website, it is highly likely to be fake or heavily manipulated. Reputable news organizations will always cover significant, verifiable events quickly and broadly.
Q3: How should I investigate a news source if its website looks professional and legitimate?
Go beyond the main article and actively look for transparency clues. Check the "About Us" section for contact information, the organization's mission, and details about its editorial staff. Be highly skeptical of domains that mimic famous brands (e.g., using .infonet instead of .com) or sites that lack verifiable authors. A credible news source will always link their authors to real, existing people with established expertise in the field.
Addressing the Threat of Deepfakes and AI Content
Q4: Why are deepfakes a much greater threat in 2025 compared to previous years?
The accessibility and quality of AI generation tools have vastly improved, allowing sophisticated fakes to be created quickly and cheaply by almost anyone. Modern AI struggles less with basic errors, making them visually and audibly more convincing than early deepfakes. This rise means that individuals must now assume that any visual or audio content they view online could potentially be artificially generated and misleading.
Q5: What specific visual anomalies should I look for to identify an AI-generated deepfake video?
Focus on intricate details that AI still struggles to produce naturally. Look for inconsistencies in facial features, such as eyes that lack natural reflections or teeth that appear too uniform or unnatural. The speed and regularity of blinking is also a key indicator; humans typically blink 15–20 times per minute, but deepfakes may blink too rarely or unnaturally. Finally, look for illogical lighting or shadow patterns that contradict the environment.
Q6: Besides the visual aspects, how can I detect manipulation in the audio track of a deepfake?
Detecting audio manipulation requires listening for subtle inconsistencies and unnatural sounds. A common giveaway is a lack of synchronization between the speaker's lip movements and the sound they are making. Listen critically for a robotic or slightly metallic timbre in the voice, unexplained pauses, or changes in pronunciation. Additionally, check if the background noise or ambient sounds logically fit the visual environment being displayed.
Using Technology and Tools for Verification
Q7: Should I rely solely on specialized AI detection software to verify video content?
No single tool is sufficient, as AI detection technology is constantly playing catch-up with generative AI. While specialized software like TruthScan can flag potential artifacts, it should be used in combination with other methods. A more reliable approach is to check for hidden content credentials or embedded metadata, which can be verified using tools provided by initiatives like the Content Authenticity Initiative.
Add comment
Comments